We had to figure out how the projections would work. The 7-minute cut was well received, but I learned that it was not a film project, but a community project, which would require some different skills! Due to pressures of getting a rough edit done, I had not looked at all the footage and only skimmed to interesting bits, used Favourites, some keywords and put together a timeline. I've always wanted someway of locking different parts of an edit, as it is so easy to move something that messes everything else up - checking in and checking out would be a good way to go. The new FCPX project snapshot feature provided some security and versioning, but sometimes I was editing the snapshot rather than the original project file. But it was already getting a bit out of hand. We would have to slim down on equipment and interview time! (See Typical Setup Photo above and early promo produced in August).įast-forward to early September, there was a meeting for all those involved going through what the project was about - time for a quick rough edit from the first 13 interviews.Īt that time, I only had the footage from my camera so it was easy to import each interview as a new event into one library (see FCPX screenshot below). The shoot took about 4 hours with intro, setup, filming and some impromptu lunch. We tried using a clapperboard, but it was off-putting - hopefully we could sync it up in FCPX later. The original plan was to film outside, but it was raining and the couple we were interviewing were going on holiday the next day. On the first interview on a Saturday morning in late July at a house way out of town, we turned up with everything - 5 cameras, tripods, lights, booms, greenscreen, slider and took over the house. The questions started coming including how the projections would work (one projector, multiple projectors?), how would we produce content/edit for each screen and how would the live performances fit in? Pete had lots of experience in music and community projects and would be getting musicians, performers and general helpers involved. Who is involved? Me, Pete and Nic Duncan were the core group. Who are we interviewing? We don't know yet - probably 10-15 people. Will there be live music? Yes - we hope so. Was it a film? No, but there would be film in it. I had not been involved in a community project before and trying to communicate what the project was about to others was difficult. The project was called 'Rhythms of Life' and it would involve other community members responding to the interviews with music, dance, and writing. Pete envisioned filming local community elders about their life and having the interviews projected onto multiple screens. The green light was given in mid June 2014. ![]() Months later, the project had developed into a full-blown multi-screen live event. ![]() The project began back in early 2014 - I had been asked by Peter Keelan, the Creative Director, if I would be interested in running some workshops and filming some interviews for Denmark Arts (subject to getting the funding). This write-up may help others with any basic FCPX features, my (imperfect) workflow, tools, ideas, or to avoid any mistakes I made. This was a seat-of-your-pants-tight-deadlines-low-budget-live-performance-community-involvement-real-life project involving 26 interviews, 2 filmmakers/editors, 17 musicians and performers, 14 live production crew, 8 projection screens, and 2 live performances. We will let him take up the story on this rather fabulous community project: We have to thank Tim Maisey for this rather unique FCPX user story. ![]() Video, music, dancers and over 60 live cues in the show - how was it done? A production in Australia used Final Cut Pro X to edit films for multiple screens in a live performance.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |